FILE--This June 29, 2012, file photo shows the Interstate 5 bridge spanning the Columbia River between Oregon and Washington states, near Vancouver, Wash.
Rick Bowmer / AP
Washington state lawmakers on Monday backed a huge increase in the amount of toll revenues they’ll count on to help pay for construction of a replacement bridge on Interstate 5 across the Columbia River.
The House Transportation Committee amended then approved House Bill 1958, authorizing the sale of $2.5 billion in general obligation bonds. That’s $900 million more than assumed in the original bill. The legislation now goes to the Rules Committee and a likely floor vote in the coming days.
With significant cost increases on major highway and bridge projects in recent years, it made sense to recalibrate to a higher bonding capacity to avoid getting into a pinch, backers said.
“The idea is that we have to have enough resources for construction. We think we have enough, but we want to make sure,” said Rep. Jake Fey, D-Tacoma, chair of the House Transportation Committee and the bill’s sponsor.
Sen. Marko Liias, D-Edmonds, chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, said, “We need to make sure this project is well-positioned to stay on schedule and get built as soon as possible.”
Project planners have estimated the price tag for replacing the bridge will range from $5 billion to $7.5 billion, with a likely figure of around $6 billion. Permits are anticipated by 2026. Once rolling, construction is expected to last until 2032.
Washington and Oregon have committed about $1 billion each and the states have snagged federal grants totaling $2.1 billion.
Tolls were counted on to raise at least $1.2 billion of the current projected cost. They’ll be imposed in both directions on the existing bridge as early as spring of 2026.
Because Washington will be administering the tolling program, it is the one that needs to issue the bonds.
Bonds, a long-assumed source of financing for the new span linking Washington and Oregon, would pay for design and construction, as well as future maintenance and operation.
The borrowed money would be repaid with toll proceeds, gas taxes, and vehicle fees. Because the bonds would be backed by “the full faith and credit of the state,” the general fund could be tapped as a last-resort source of repayment.
Rep. John Ley, R-Vancouver, a vocal opponent of tolling, opposed the bill in committee on Monday. He said he’ll propose changes when it reaches the House floor for a vote.
Ley said he’ll offer an amendment to ensure Washington and Oregon share equally in the liability if there are not enough proceeds to repay the bonds. As written, responsibility would fall solely upon Washington, he argued.
More importantly, he said, with a new project cost estimate due out in summer, it’s too soon for this conversation.
“We shouldn’t be talking about bonding tolls until we have a price tag,” he said.
Washington State Standard is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501(c)(3) public charity.
This republished story is part of OPB’s broader effort to ensure that everyone in our region has access to quality journalism that informs, entertains and enriches their lives. To learn more, visit opb.org/partnerships.
